Skip to content
Vizavi
Company-wide intelligence · source-backed

See the whole company. Zoom in to the facts.

Vizavi connects the systems where work happens, then shows what changed, why it matters, and the sources behind it. We agree the integration scope and supported data sources with your team before the pilot.

3–5 expensive questions · 8 weeks · agreed sources

Permissions agreed first. Every important answer stays linked to its sources.

Investigation PlaybackIllustrative workflow

Why did the Acme forecast move from $4M to $3.5M?

3 causes · 6 sources · 2 commitments at risk

The decline is linked to an implementation delay, reduced scope, and new security requirements. The latest forecast is 3–4 weeks late.

Event chain

  1. Jun 12 · 10:14Deal scope changed
  2. Jun 14 · 16:42Implementation slipped
  3. Jun 16 · 11:28New security requirements
  4. Jun 18 · 09:03Forecast corrected
5 sources fresh1 conflict flagged

Next action

Align the new launch plan and confirm the revised scope.

Owner: Ethan · Due: Jun 22

Continuous zoom

From a company-wide signal to the facts behind it.

  1. Source signal

    Code, CRM, ticket, message, document

  2. Change

    What moved across connected systems

  3. Decision

    What was decided, assumed, or left open

  4. Impact

    What the change affects and why it matters

  5. Next action

    What needs to happen next

The whole picture. In 30 seconds.

Sound on. Captions included.
One intelligence layer

Every function asks different questions. The evidence stays connected.

Executive & operating view

Where should leadership pay attention today?

What materially changed across the company since yesterday?
Rollout risk increasedSecurityHigh confidence
Two commitments movedDeliveryNeeds attention
Forecast changedRevenueSource conflict

Engineering & security

What changed between a finding, a fix, and a release decision?

Why is the production rollout still blocked?
Control requirement addedSecurityFinding
Fix merged to release branchGitHubChange
Production gate remains blockedCI/CDImpact

Revenue & delivery

Why did a forecast, deadline, or customer commitment move?

What changed, who knew, and what needs action now?
Scope promise changedMeetingDecision
Delivery moved four weeksProjectImpact
Forecast still shows old valueCRMConflict
Composite workflows · illustrative

Start high-level. Go as deep as the decision requires.

These examples show how Vizavi connects permitted sources. They are illustrative workflows, not customer testimonials.

Operating leader reviewing a cross-functional company briefOperating leadership

Starting question

Why did a critical rollout move by four weeks?

The answer is split across a security finding, a GitHub change, delivery tickets, and a Slack escalation.

SecurityGitHubJiraSlack

Sourced outcome

One chronological chain shows the new control, the merged fix, the remaining gate, and the accountable owner.

4 systems7 source moments1 next owner
Delivery leader tracing a customer commitment across systemsRevenue & delivery

Starting question

Why did the forecast change after the customer meeting?

Scope, timeline, and ownership changed in different systems at different times.

MeetingEmailCRMProject plan

Sourced outcome

Vizavi keeps the conflict visible, reconstructs the sequence, and identifies the commitment that needs review.

4 systems1 conflict2 commitments
Team member preparing with verified company contextEveryday company work

Starting question

What should I know before I make this decision?

The relevant context lives in documents, previous discussions, tasks, dashboards, and team messages.

DocsTasksAnalyticsTeams

Sourced outcome

A concise brief separates confirmed facts, open questions, and the sources worth opening next.

4 systems6 citations3 open questions
Company-wide coverage

Connect the systems the company already runs on.

Vizavi is not limited to meetings, accounts, or projects. We agree the integration scope and supported data sources with your team before the pilot. The categories below describe the intended company-wide coverage.

Business systems

  • CRM, tasks, and calendars
  • Google Workspace and Microsoft 365
  • Documents and knowledge bases

Engineering

  • GitHub and GitLab
  • Code, reviews, and releases
  • CI/CD and delivery signals

Security & data

  • Security and access events
  • Analytics and operational data
  • Explicit freshness and source state

Communication

  • Email, Slack, and Teams
  • Meetings and notetakers
  • Optional in-person capture

Understand & act

  • Cross-system timelines
  • Decisions, risks, and commitments
  • Briefs and accountable next steps

Govern

  • Permission-aware retrieval
  • Citations and provenance
  • Human-reviewed actions
Vizavi In-Person

Your best recorder is the one your team already trusts.

We do not require another proprietary gadget. Use a compatible room microphone, wireless kit, or pocket recorder-then turn the conversation into searchable evidence, decisions, and accountable follow-through.

  • Live Capture with a selected microphone
  • File Import from supported recorders
  • Direct Sync only when verified
  • The same source-backed context chain

Your hardware

No proprietary device required

  • Room mic

  • Wireless kit

  • Pocket recorder

Live Capture or File Import

Vizavi In-Person

  • Transcript
  • Decisions
  • Follow-ups
Illustrative device categories. Hardware is not sold by Vizavi.
Trust and governance

Built to be trusted. Built to be checked.

Inspect the evidenceCheck the supporting sources
Agreed access scopePermissions reviewed before connection
Uncertainty is visibleHonest about limits
Source state is explicitFresh, stale, missing, or conflicting
Human approvalImportant actions stay reviewed

Permissions are agreed before retrieval. Important conclusions remain linked to their sources. Review privacy.

Your pilot

Test Vizavi on a real cross-functional workflow.

Start with a few expensive questions, connect only the agreed sources, and verify the answers against real work.

  1. 01

    Choose the questions

    Select 3–5 decisions or investigations where fragmented context already has a cost.

  2. 02

    Agree on the sources

    Connect one cross-functional workflow with explicit permissions and success criteria.

  3. 03

    Verify the answers

    Review every conclusion, conflict, source, and next action with the people doing the work.

A bounded first step

Choose a company question that spans systems.
We’ll reconstruct what changed, why, and where the evidence is.

Agreed questions · 8 weeks · agreed sources

Necessary storage supports sign-in and service operation. Optional product analytics stays off until you allow it. You can change your choice in Cookie settings. Cookie Policy